A few pieces of machinery are moved to a new location or set aside to make room for replacements. On the other hand, this appears to be the only field of action without true factory planning character. The only remaining option is a reorganization of existing factory building structures – in the course of relocation. Radical modifications or extensions are very rarely the rule. The dream of a new production facility, built on a greenfield site and designed in accordance with all the latest knowledge, often remains an economically unrealistic proposition for years or even decades. And this can usually only be managed with external assistance.Īll this leads to the widespread perception that factory planning itself should always to be viewed as a project, and that it is only seldom necessary to undertake such efforts.īut why is that? Is it not true that technological change is moving faster and faster? Does it make sense to react to a constant pressure to adjust with radical change projects? Would it not be better to treat factory planning as a permanent process, and to continually weigh up possible change scenarios in order to be able to respond quickly and flexibly?īut even though management science has regularly introduced new factory concepts over the past decades, along with the required models and methods, most enterprises have so far remained quite literally unable to cast off their old skin. It often becomes a separate project in its own right, and possibly even a huge one. This brings factory planning into the focus of company management. In such phases of radically perceptible change, the discussion also tends to revolve around extraordinarily high investment sums. why the subject has become a topic of explicit interest in the first place. These are also the most frequently mentioned reasons for placing factory planning on the agenda, i.e. Perhaps the factories of the future will even look like the one sketched here as the vision for a vertical factory? But with continuously increasing population density, factories must begin to function in urban environments – or even enrich them. The smoking industrial chimneys of past times also fascinated people, even though they have since founded a widespread opinion that immediate factory environments are unattractive. They are often seen as pleasing to the eye and fuel an intuitive curiosity to experience them from inside – not just because they combine functionality and aesthetics no, it is rather that factories have always stood for innovation and progress. This also explains why the outward appearance of many factories develops over time. Instead, preference is given to durably viable structures which can be adapted easily without new major projects. And such change should naturally be sustainable and positive! Accordingly, the implicit wish is that radical change should not happen too often.
#Factory town development goals professional#
While professional factory planners view their work as a calling with the character of a large-scale project, operators will typically interpret factory planning as practically relevant modification of the system in which their daily activities are rooted. This sub area planning effort built on previous work that was done for both the Sugar Factory and the STEAM areas, and will knit together this neighborhood and build on opportunities such as the proximity of the river, downtown, and transit.These two opposing perspectives already indicate that it will be difficult to assign a generally accepted meaning to the term. Storm Drainage & Sustainable Infrastructure.Transportation (including bike and pedestrian connections).
Urban Design (architecture and character).Land Use (mix of housing, commercial, community and other uses).The plan focuses on the following topics, while encompassing equity, sustainability, and resilience as guiding principles: Project Context The Sugar Factory + STEAM sub area planning project was launched by the City of Longmont in late 2021 to develop a vision for the area south of Downtown Longmont that stretches from the Ken Pratt Blvd & E 3rd Ave intersection to the East to Main St to the West. The preferred alternative will use the established plan priorities as a guide:įlip through this presentation for additional information on the plan and the alternatives considered to date.
We will be using this feedback to develop a preferred alternative that can be incorporated into the final plan. Thanks for your Feedback on the Plan Alternatives! The project team appreciates the input on the plan alternatives.
0 kommentar(er)
